Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Raul Brancaccio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Aug at 12:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Budkov Kjaer vs R. Brancaccio

NOR
2
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kjaer 2 - 0 Brancaccio
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer winning 4 and Raul Brancaccio winning 0. The last match between Nicolai Budkov Kjaer and Raul Brancaccio was at the Como Challenger, 30-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kjaer | 2 |
| Brancaccio | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Como Challenger(08-30-25)
(R2) Glasgow Challenger(02-20-25)
N. B. Kjaer vs R. Brancaccio H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $58,345 | Career Prize Money | $119,520 |
| 65.52% (76-40) | Career Total W/L | 57.53% (382-282) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 37.50% (3-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. B. Kjaer vs R. Brancaccio Match Preview:
- In recent form, Brancaccio has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 45.52% of points compared to Kjaer's 43.01%. Could this be crucial in determining the match winner? It certainly suggests Brancaccio has a slight advantage here.
- Analyzing return game stats, Brancaccio has a slight advantage in winning opponent's second serve points (46.32% to Kjaer's 45.33%), but Kjaer edges out on first serve return points (30.09% to Brancaccio's 27.84%). Which stat is more critical? The higher correlation indicates the first serve return might be more impactful.
- Both players show similar skills under pressure, with Brancaccio saving 52.54% of breakpoints and Kjaer 51.6%. Such similarity could suggest an evenly matched contest in crucial moments.
- Over the past year, Kjaer boasts a better win rate (65.33%) compared to Brancaccio (58.82%). Does this superior win percentage make Kjaer the likely favorite? It could indicate better overall performance.
- Surface preference shows Brancaccio is best on Hard courts (61% win), whereas Kjaer excels on Indoor Hard (68% win). Considering the upcoming event's surface could be a deciding factor.
- In terms of competition level, Kjaer has faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank 318.83) than Brancaccio (average rank 403.79) over the last year, which might contribute to more challenging matches and potentially better preparation.
- In their head-to-head record, Kjaer has a clear edge, winning their only previous encounter in straight sets. Could past performance predict future outcomes? The precedent suggests Kjaer is a strong contender.
- Brancaccio struggles in deciding sets, winning only 35% over the last year, while Kjaer wins 63%. If the match is close, this stat could heavily favor Kjaer.
- Break point conversion shows Kjaer is slightly more effective, converting 36% versus Brancaccio's 31.72%. An important factor during tight games.
Editorial Prediction (August 30, 2025, UTC):
The comparison of recent performance metrics indicates that both players have areas of strength and weakness. Brancaccio shows a slight advantage in second serve performance and saving break points, suggesting a solid baseline game.
However, Kjaer’s superior overall win rate over the past year, as well as previous head-to-head dominance, suggest he has the upper hand. The ability to face and overcome stronger opponents regularly may give Kjaer the competitive edge required to prevail.
Considering Kjaer's advantages in first serve return effectiveness, break point conversion, and deciding set performance prediction, combined with his head-to-head success, Kjaer appears more likely to win the forthcoming match.
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Raul Brancaccio Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. B. Kjaer vs R. Brancaccio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 17 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:22:54 | Average Match Time | 1:22:54 |
| 63% (75/119) | 1st Serve % | 62% (91/147) |
| 75% (56/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (61/91) |
| 70% (31/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (23/56) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 43% (63/147) | Return Points Win % | 27% (32/119) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. B. Kjaer Recent Matches Played
R. Brancaccio Recent Matches Played

N. B. Kjaer vs R. Brancaccio Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.52% (76/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.53% (382/282) |
| 62.17% (166/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.99% (868/655) |
| 53.74% (1365/1175) | Games Win/Loss | 53.41% (7434/6485) |
| 63.16% (12/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.95% (64/41) |
| 66.07% (37/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.50% (289/205) |
| 68.57% (24/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.16% (28/34) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 383 | Aces Total | 1102 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 276 | Total Double Faults | 1879 |
| 1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:24:36 |
| 340.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.03 |
| 62% (4605/7425) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24555/39657) |
| 68% (3132/4605) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16110/24555) |
| 52% (1459/2820) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7277/15102) |
| 45% (346/766) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2098/4615) |
| 41% (3070/7407) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17565/40640) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 68.33% (41/19) | Challenger W/L | 50.69% (146/142) |
| 74.29% (26/9) | Futures W/L | 65.04% (227/122) |
| 66% (76/115) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (374/653) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 69% (22/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (90/166) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (89/196) |
| 91% (69/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (384/334) |
| 9% (69/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (384/49) |
| 28% (47/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (280/47) |